“I’m working with a family of flower feeders,” is what a nameless narrator shares with us, an ardent naturalist who travels to a nameless village to study moths. Early on, it’s clear the text hinges on the narrators routine observations of these ‘specimens,’ but at heart Olstein uses this instance as representative of even greater thematic concerns: questioning propinquity and a pursuit of knowledge.
Although a bit hard to follow and not necessarily my favorite work that we have encountered this semester, The Lost Alphabet leaves much to be discussed. My biggest take away was Olstein’s development of the narrator and her narrative technique that cleverly holds the reader’s attention. Retaining epistolary undertones, the text moves from poetic to documentary to diary-like. In select instances, we are given a glimpse into Olstein’s more personal thoughts, readily tangible to the reader, “Some mornings I’m filled with longing, with sadness that has no cause” (35), and become more bold and apparent by the book’s end, “In wanting to show the best of myself, I reveal only a fraction” (67). The snippets are fantastical notions, constructing a dream-like world of fiction. This is furthered by the many proverbs and sentiments sprinkled throughout, “Am I meant simply to observe, to record?” (55) and “How will I know when this work is done?” (56). By doing so, Olstein strikes a balance between the provincial and personal in her own lyrical manner, reigning in the reader to an inventive and imaginative world.
Narration is best depicted in the poem entitled, “[the immovable moves]” where the reader is given a very precise instance that is broadened before our very eyes, reflective of a much larger conceptual issue at hand. Here we exhibit the “nature” and observance of the pursuit of knowledge:
I have learned to peer at specimens through a small crack at the center of my fist. It’s a habit herders use for distance: vision is concentrated, the crude tunnel brings into focus whatever small expanse lies on the other side, something in the narrowing magnifies what remains. At the table, my hand tires of clenching, my left eye of closing, my right of its squint, but the effect: a blurred carpet of wing becomes a careful weave of eyelashes colored, curved, exquisitely laid. It is a lens for looking at fractions; I’m unable to bring even a whole antenna or eye into view. The result is kaleidoscopic: I see one sharp fragment after another break clean before me, piece it to the others in my mind’s eye.